- Skyp
- Posts
- Pipeline Math for Founders Who Hate Sales
Pipeline Math for Founders Who Hate Sales
A simple model that tells you how many emails you need—without vibes.
Hope you had a great Christmas! I doubt many are working today, but in case you are… here’s to you! I might be, too. A little bit. Onto today’s newsletter! Super helpful as you start thinking about Q1 2026, now less than a week away.
Most founders don’t “hate sales.”
They hate uncertainty.
The worst part of outbound isn’t writing emails—it’s the feeling of:
“Are we doing enough… or just flailing harder?”
So here’s the math. Simple. Boring. Reliable. (Like a good accountant with caffeine.)
The 4 numbers that matter
You only need four inputs to predict how many cold emails you need to hit a meeting goal:
Meetings goal (M)
How many meetings you want this month.Deliverability (D)
What % of emails actually land (not bounce/spam). Use a conservative estimate if unsure.Reply rate (R)
Replies / emails delivered.“Good reply → meeting” rate (G)
Of the replies that are actually relevant/positive, what % convert to a booked meeting.
Formula:
Emails needed = M ÷ (D × R × G)
Quick example (realistic numbers)
Let’s say you want 12 meetings/month.
D = 0.90 (90% land)
R = 0.05 (5% reply rate)
G = 0.25 (25% of replies become meetings)
Conversion = 0.90 × 0.05 × 0.25 = 0.01125 (1.125%)
Emails needed = 12 ÷ 0.01125 = 1067 emails/month
Over ~20 workdays → ~53 emails/day
Now you’re not guessing. You’re budgeting.
And, by the way, a 1% overall meeting rate is achievable–but not every one will do that well.
Why “send more” is usually the wrong answer
When founders don’t hit goals, the reflex is: increase volume.
But volume is the last lever you touch—because it’s the most expensive one:
You burn through your best accounts faster
You collect noisy data (more bad fits = worse insights)
You risk deliverability issues if your targeting/message is off
You create “activity” without improving the system
If your reply rate is weak, doubling sends just doubles silence.
That’s not scaling. That’s louder disappointment.
How to improve the right number first
Use this order. It’s the fastest path to more meetings with the same send volume:
1) Fix D (deliverability) first
If emails don’t land, nothing else matters. Keep domains warm, lists clean, and don’t spray-and-pray.
2) Then fix R (reply rate)
Reply rate is mostly: targeting + first 2 lines + clarity of your ask.
If R is low, your message isn’t resonating or you’re hitting the wrong people.
3) Then fix G (“good reply → meeting”)
If you’re getting replies but not meetings, your CTA is too heavy, too vague, or you’re pulling in the wrong intent.
Make the ask lighter, and tighten the ICP so the right people reply.
Only after you’ve improved those… increase volume.
Skyp helps you run this like a system: you set one goal prompt, generate unique emails with a consistent structure, and then track what’s breaking (deliverability, replies, or conversion) so you improve the right number first—instead of just sending more and hoping harder.