• Skyp
  • Posts
  • Founder Voice, SDR Hands

Founder Voice, SDR Hands

Keep tone as you scale the team. Includes a style guide, before/after examples, prompt pack, and a review checklist you can duplicate.

Why this matters

When your first SDR (or two) starts sending, results dip if the voice becomes generic. Buyers reply to a human point of view: clear, specific, respectful. Lock the tone once, then make it easy for others to execute.

Goal: a 1‑page guide anyone can read in 5 minutes and sound like you within 10.

What founders actually mean by “voice”
Not poetry. It’s three choices you make consistently:

  1. Angle: the problem you single out first.

  2. Tempo: short, declarative sentences vs. winding explanations.

  3. Offer: the smallest credible next step (checklist, 2‑week pilot, 10‑min fit check).

Common failure modes

  • SDR uses buzzwords to sound “professional” → loses trust.

  • First line misses the trigger → sounds like a blast.

  • Too many claims → feels like a pitch, not help.

  • Copy over 120 words → burying the ask.

Quick fix
Have the SDR read one of your sent emails out loud. Anywhere they stumble or add filler is where the guide needs a rule.

Voice Style Guide (1‑pager)

Positioning sentence (15 words):
We help {persona} fix {pain} in {timeframe} without a big project.

Pillars (rules that never change)

  1. Plain > Clever. Short words; no buzzwords.

  2. Specific > Vague. Name the trigger, role, and metric.

  3. Helpful > Pushy. Offer a small, safe next step.

  4. Evidence > Claims. One micro‑case; no chest‑thumping.

  5. Respectful > Cute. No fake RE/FWD, no urgency games.

Persona tokens
{persona}{company}{trigger}{metric}{timeframe}{proof_company}{delta}

Phrases we use

  • “quick path” • “small, safe step” • “two options” • “one‑pager” • “pilot, credited if we continue”

Phrases we avoid

  • “circle back” • “touch base” • “exclusive offer” • “guarantee” • fake threads (RE:/FWD:)

Sign‑off
— {Founder first name} @ {company}

Mini glossary (so SDRs don’t guess)

  • Trigger: a recent change we can point to (hiring, deadline, migration).

  • Micro‑case: a 40–60 word story with conflict → action → outcome.

  • Safe next step: no‑risk action (share checklist, 10‑min fit check, 2‑week pilot).

Prompt Pack (drop into your tool)

System / global prompt snippet

Write in a founder’s voice: plain, specific, respectful. Always cite the trigger in line one, then offer a small next step. Include one micro‑case or proof only if relevant. Never use buzzwords, emojis, or fake threads. Keep to ≤120 words. Mirror the prospect’s role and metric.

Campaign‑level additives

  • If trigger is hiring surge → emphasize onboarding time and access cleanup.

  • If trigger is new audit/date → emphasize low‑effort checklist and a 2‑week window.

  • If trigger is tool migration → emphasize field/flow map and zero‑leak handoff.

Coaching markup (how to comment on drafts)

  • Highlight green where the trigger is named. If missing, ask: “What changed for them?”

  • Underline the ask; if there are two, delete one.

  • Circle any buzzword; replace with plainer words.

  • Margin note: “Micro‑case here” where a proof would help.

Before / After Examples (generic B2B SaaS)

1) Bad → Better (hiring surge)

  • Before (generic):
    “Hey there, saw you’re scaling—our platform accelerates onboarding with AI. Can we schedule 30–45 minutes?”

  • After (founder voice):
    “Saw 12 AE roles opened this week—onboarding time usually balloons right then. I can share a 4‑day access plan other teams used. Tue 10:30 or Wed 3:00?”

  • Why it works: names the trigger, offers a tiny next step, gives a concrete benefit.

2) Bad → Better (audit date)

  • Before:
    “Compliance is critical and we offer world‑class security with best‑in‑class encryption.”

  • After:
    “Your audit lands in August—the scramble is evidence collection in week four. We auto‑pull the log/ticket pieces so the package is done early. Want the 1‑pager?”

  • Why it works: swaps claims for a specific pain + relief.

3) Bad → Better (tool migration)

  • Before:
    “We seamlessly integrate with HubSpot and Salesforce to ensure data continuity.”

  • After:
    “Moving from HubSpot → Salesforce? The leaks are fields and workflows. I can walk you through a 60‑minute field/flow map that halves time‑to‑first‑report.”

  • Why it works: shows you understand the messy middle; sets a time‑boxed help.

4) Bad → Better (finance owner)

  • Before:
    “We deliver ROI by leveraging advanced analytics to optimize costs.”

  • After:
    “Quarter‑end pressure is forecast swings. Copying a cost‑driver tab that got variance under 5% in two cycles—want it?”

  • Why it works: concrete metric, short action.

5) Bad → Better (service business)

  • Before:
    “We’re a full‑service consultancy driving digital transformation.”

  • After:
    “Warehouse pick rates dipped after the new layout. We can run a 2‑week sprint on one aisle and show the lift—credit the fee if we continue.”

  • Why it works: one aisle (small), one result (lift), one next step (sprint).

SDR Review Checklist (use before sending)

  • Line 1 names a specific trigger about the buyer.

  • One ask only; PS offers a lighter path if needed.

  • Body ≤120 words; short sentences; no jargon.

  • Includes one proof (micro‑case) or none—never a list.

  • Links 0–1; branded; no shorteners.

  • Subject 25–45 chars; matches the body; no fake threads.

  • Sign‑off uses founder name; no signatures longer than 3 lines.

Day‑two coaching script (10 minutes)

  1. Read the SDR’s email aloud together.

  2. Ask: “Where did we name the trigger?” If nowhere, fix line one.

  3. Ask: “What’s the smallest next step?” Remove anything else.

  4. Add one micro‑case or delete all proof.

  5. Re‑send to a safe list and compare reply quality.

“Voice Lock” Warmup (first week with a new SDR)

Day 1: SDR rewrites 5 founder‑sent emails; founder marks A/B/C with comments.
Day 2: SDR personalizes 20 openers; founder approves the first 10.
Day 3: Go live to safe list (≤30/day). SDR owns replies using objection snippets.
Day 5: 15‑minute retro: compare replies from founder vs SDR—tune prompts.

Mini case (4 days to voice lock)
A team of two SDRs started flat. After swapping in the guide + coaching markup, line‑one triggers appeared in 90% of sends and reply rate rose from 1.8% → 4.1% in a week. The only change: smaller asks and a micro‑case in message two.

Lock your voice once, then let the team send at quality. Launch a supervised campaign in under 10 minutes—prompts hold tone, SDRs personalize, and every message is one‑of‑one per lead.

 Try Skyp free for 7 days → skyp.ai